Key links: 
 _'GW'_ The Register logo     GordonWatts.com     GordonWayneWatts.com     6th U.S. Cir. Court of Appeals    U.S. Supreme Court    (Wikipedia)    Court Humour   
The Register presents:
Selected docket items in the "U.S. Supreme Court Gay Marriage" case from The Register's archives: an unofficial (but hopefully accurate) docket:
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ?-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Consolidated Docket: U.S. Supreme Court's 4 'Gay Marriage' cases
Case #: 14-556 (James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners v. Richard Hodges, Dir., Ohio Dept. of Health, et al.) Appeal From: 6th U.S. Cir. Court of Appeals: (14-3057, 14-3464)
Case #: 14-562 (Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners v. Bill Haslam, Gov of Tennessee, et al.) Appeal From: 6th U.S. Cir. Court of Appeals: (14-5297)
Case #: 14-571 (April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners v. Rick Snyder, Gov of Michigan, et al.) Appeal From: 6th U.S. Cir. Court of Appeals: (14-1341)
Case #: 14-574 (Gregory Bourke, et al., Petitioners v. Steve Beshear, Gov of Kentucky, et al.) Appeal From: 6th U.S. Cir. Court of Appeals: (14-5291, 14-5818)

Questions Presented: (1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? (2) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state?

|| Last Updated: Thursday, 09 April 2015, 11:27 P.M. EST || Notes and links to court's website & possibly other respources here or above in links navigation bar.

This web page under construction.

Colour-Code: The docket background shall pattern itself after the colour of the court briefs, for ease of reading. According to U.S. Supreme Court RULE 33.1(g) ("Document Preparation: Booklet Format; 8½ by 11-Inch Paper Format"), "cover colors for booklet-format documents are as follows":

Date Docketed
Proceedings and Orders (Click to view/download)
Filed By
Notes
Date Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (Petitioner / Appellant) White cover for brief
Date Brief in Opposition (for a Writ of Certiorari) (Respondent / Appellee) Orange cover for brief
Date Reply to Brief in Opposition (for a Writ of Certiorari) (Petitioner / Appellant again, gets in last word) Tan (e.g., light brown) cover for brief
Date (Initial/Opening) Brief on the Merits for Petitioner or Appellant (Petitioner / Appellant) Light blue cover for brief
Date (Answer/Response) Brief on the Merits for Respondent or Appellee (Respondent / Appellee) Light red cover for brief
Date (Closing) Reply Brief on the Merits by the Petitioner or Appellant (Petitioner / Appellant again, gets in last word) Yellow cover for brief
Date Any brief (Amicus Curiae briefs are included) filed by the government is gray The U.S. or any party represented by the Solicitor General is referred to here "A document filed by the United States, or by any other federal party represented by the Solicitor General, shall have a gray cover." [Rule 33.1(e)]
Date Brief for an Amicus Curiae at the Petition (for a Writ of Certiorari) Stage A friend of the court, not a party, but someone who, supposedly, "brings to the attention of the Court relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties [and will therefore] be of considerable help to the Court.” [Rule 37.1] Cream-colour cover for brief
Date Brief for an Amicus Curiae in Support of the Plaintiff, Petitioner, or Appellant, or in Support of Neither Party, on the Merits A friend of the court Light green cover for brief
Date Brief for an Amicus Curiae in Support of the Defendant, Respondent, or Appellee, on the Merits A friend of the court Dark green cover for brief
Date Petition for Rehearing (Rule 44) Whomever loses is allowed to ask for a rehearing, but it must “be limited to intervening circumstances [in other words, new happenings since last filing] of a substantial or controlling effect or to other substantial grounds not previously presented.” (Rule 44.2) Tan (e.g., light brown) cover for brief
Date Miscelaneous The editor of this web page Royal Purple, though not used in the court's rules, nonetheless is used for miscelaneous purposes, in this unofficial docket web-page, such as for the background-colour for the opinion below or other Court action.
Date Headers The editor of this web page Black, also not used in the court's rules, however, is used as a background-colour along with gray-coloured font, for the headers of this unofficial docket web-page.



Date Docketed
Proceedings and Orders (Click to view/download)
Filed By
Notes
Nov 6 2014 Opinion Below U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals This is the decision being appealed.
Date Petitions for Writs of Certiorari Petitioners Appealing & asking the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
Nov 14 2014 No. 14-556 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2014) James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners, represented by Alphonse A. Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA Comments
Nov 14 2014 No. 14-562 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2014) Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners, represented by Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray Comments
Nov 14 2014 No. 14-571 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2014) April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners, represented by Carole M. Stanyar, J.D., apparently a solo practitioner: (per Lawyers.com - per Martindale.com) Comments
Nov 18 2014 No. 14-574 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2014) Gregory Bourke, et al., Petitioners, represented by Daniel J. Canon of Clay Daniel Walton Adams, PLC. Comments
Date Misc. filings Filer Comments
Nov 14 2014 No. 14-562 Appendix of Valeria Tanco, et al. filed. Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners Comments
Dec 9 2014 No. 14-562 Motion for leave to intervene filed by Chris Sevier. Filer Comments
Dec 19 2014 No. 14-556 Letter from counsel for petitioners dated December 19, 2014, received waiving 14-day waiting period pursuant to Rule 15.5. James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners Comments
Dec 19 2014 No. 14-562 Letter from counsel for petitioners dated December 19, 2014, received waiving 14-day waiting period pursuant to Rule 15.5. Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners Comments
Dec 22 2014 No. 14-562 Response in opposition to motion for leave to intervene filed by respondents. (Distributed) Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners Comments
Jan 20 2015 No. 14-562 Motion for leave to intervene filed by Chris Sevier DENIED. Order of the Court Comments
Feb 27 2015 Joint appendix for No. 14-556, 14-562 & 14-574 filed (2 volumes). (Statement of costs filed) VIDED. Parties proper 3 of the 4 petitioners, excepting apparently, No. 14-571, April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners
Date Letters of Consent to the filing of Amicus Curiae briefs Parties proper 5 of the 8 parties granted such blanket consent: "A petitioner or respondent may submit to the Clerk a letter granting blanket consent to amicus curiae briefs, stating that the party consents to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either or of neither party. The Clerk will note all notices of blanket consent on the docket." Rule 37.2(a), for pre-cert stage. See also Rule 37.3(a) for a similar rule for cases that have been cranted cert and are, therefore, in the mertit's stage.
Dec 8 2014 No. 14-556 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Richard Hodges, Dir, Ohio Dept of Health, et al. Comments
Feb 4 2015 No. 14-562 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents Haslam, et al., in No. 14-562. VIDED Bill Haslam, Gov of Tennessee, et al. Comments
Dec 1 2014 No. 14-571 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the respondents. Rick Snyder, Gov of Michigan, et al. Comments
Dec 2 2014 No. 14-571 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners Comments
Dec 8 2014 No. 14-574 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent. Steve Beshear, Gov of Kentucky, et al. Comments
Date Briefs of respondents (for or against a Writ of Certiorari) Respondents / Appelleess Comments
Dec 12 2014 No. 14-556 Brief of respondent Richard Hodges, Dir, Ohio Dept of Health filed. Richard Hodges, Dir, Ohio Dept of Health, et al. Comments
Dec 15 2014 No. 14-562 Brief of respondents Bill Haslam, Gov of Tennessee, et al. in opposition filed. Bill Haslam, Gov of Tennessee, et al. Comments
Nov 24 2014 Brief of respondents Rick Snyder, Governor of Michigan, et al. in support filed. Rick Snyder, Gov of Michigan, et al. Comments
Dec 8 2014 No. 14-574 Brief of respondent Steve Beshear, Gov of Kentucky in support filed. Steve Beshear, Gov of Kentucky, et al. Comments
Date Various Amicus Curiae briefs in the "pre-cert" phase. Various Amici Curiae "Amici Curiae" = "Friends of the court," plural. "Amicus" = singular; "Amici" = plural.   ~  Amicus Curiae briefs in the "pre-cert" phase, in other words, before the court has ruled on whether to grant a Writ of Certiorari & accept review.
Dec 9 2014 Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. in support of neither party filed. Filer Comments
Dec 15 2014 Brief amici curiae of Colage, Equality Federation, et al. filed. VIDED. Filer Comments
Dec 15 2014 Brief amicus curiae of Idaho Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter filed. VIDED. Filer Comments
Dec 15 2014 Brief amici curiae of 76 Scholars of Marriage filed. VIDED Filer Comments
Dec 18 2014 Brief amici curiae of The National Coalition of Black Pastors, and Christian Leaders filed. Filer Comments
Dec 18 2014 Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle in support of neither party filed. (Distributed) Filer Comments
Date Reply Briefs of petitioners, e.g., Replies to Briefs in Opposition (for a Writ of Certiorari) (Petitioners / Appellants again, get in last word) Comments
Dec 21 2014 No. 14-556 Reply of petitioners James Obergefell, et al. filed. James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners, represented by Alphonse A. Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA Comments
Dec 22 2014 No. 14-562 Reply of petitioners Valeria Tanco, et al. filed. Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners, represented by Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray Comments
Dec 3 2014 No. 14-571 Letter of November 25, 2014, from April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners, waiving the right to file a reply brief in support of the petition. April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners, represented by Carole M. Stanyar, J.D., apparently a solo practitioner: (per Lawyers.com - per Martindale.com) They waived their right to file a reply to respondents.
Dec 22 2014 No. 14-574 Reply of petitioners Gregory Bourke, et al. filed. Gregory Bourke, et al., Petitioners, represented by Daniel J. Canon of Clay Daniel Walton Adams, PLC. Comments
Date Court action The U.S. Supreme Court Comments
Dec 23 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015. The U.S. Supreme Court Comments
Jan 12 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015. The U.S. Supreme Court Comments
Jan 16 2015 Petition GRANTED The petitions for writs of certiorari in No. 14-562, No. 14-571, and No. 14-574 are granted. The U.S. Supreme Court The cases are consolidated and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted limited to the following questions: 1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? 2) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state? A total of ninety minutes is allotted for oral argument on Question 1. A total of one hour is allotted for oral argument on Question 2. The parties are limited to filing briefs on the merits and presenting oral argument on the questions presented in their respective petitions. The briefs of petitioners are to be filed on or before 2 p.m., Friday, February 27, 2015. The briefs of respondents are to be filed on or before 2 p.m., Friday, March 27, 2015. The reply briefs are to be filed on or before 2 p.m., Friday, April 17, 2015. VIDED
Date (Initial/Opening) Briefs on the Merits for Petitioners or Appellants (Petitioners / Appellants) Comments
Feb 27 2015 No. 14-556 Brief of petitioners James Obergefell, et al. filed. James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners, represented by Alphonse A. Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA Comments
Feb 27 2015 No. 14-562 Brief of petitioners Valeria Tanco, et al. filed. Valeria Tanco, et al., Petitioners, represented by Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray Comments
Feb 27 2015 No. 14-571 Brief of petitioners April DeBoer, et al. filed. April DeBoer, et al., Petitioners, represented by Carole M. Stanyar, J.D., apparently a solo practitioner: (per Lawyers.com - per Martindale.com) Comments
Feb 27 2015 No. 14-574 Brief of petitioners Gregory Bourke, et al. filed. Gregory Bourke, et al., Petitioners, represented by Daniel J. Canon of Clay Daniel Walton Adams, PLC. Comments
Date Briefs for Amici Curiae in Support of the Plaintiff, Petitioner, or Appellant, or in Support of Neither Party, on the Merits (Petitioners / Appellants) Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments
Date Filing Filer Comments

This research, as protected by Fair Use and International "fair dealing" law, is specifically for non-profit, educational research criticism, review, and newspaper summary.
Learn more. (Alt. 'Learn more' link.) Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ?-F (Mac) and use the find bar.
Courtesy The Register:  GordonWatts.com - GordonWayneWatts.com - Irreverent, but clean Court Humour